Since LuxLeaks and the operation of the register of beneficial owners (RBE) the government has undertaken actions to anticipate these kinds of situations. Thus, warned of the imminent publication of the OpenLux investigation, the government has visibly prepared its response to the events.

The government has anticipated the OpenLux investigation to the point of causing some gnashing of teeth in some media. This is why Pierre Gramegna regrets that the newspapers involved in OpenLux do not objectively take into account the progress made in recent years and perpetuate a truncated image of economic reality in a globalized world.
Faced with the first series of articles published by a consortium of 17 European newspapers under the banner "OpenLux", the government says it rejects "the claims contained in this series of articles as well as the totally unjustified representation of the country and its economy".
The OpenLux survey reveals unprecedented realities of the Luxembourg financial centre. It had not yet been published by Le Soir and sixteen partners on four continents, that the official Luxembourg website already published a detailed refutation, on the night of Sunday to Monday.
The response strategy was based on two axes. First, for each argument put forward in the OpenLux investigation, we find on the government's website its counter-argument. Secondly, the Luxembourg counter-attack concerns the image of the country.